Kevin Hart has been sued for millions of dollars by his former friend and actor Jonathan “JT” Jackson, who alleges the “Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle” actor violated a settlement agreement tied to Hart’s sex tape scandal.
The lawsuit, which names Hart, his company Hartbeat LLC and several others as defendants, claims Hart did not properly share an agreed-upon statement that declared Jackson’s innocence when Hart apologized over the sex tape scandal. The lawsuit also alleges that Hart and his legal team provided false evidence to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, which led to the false extortion charges against Jackson and his arrest in April 2018.
“The facts in the complaint speak for themselves,” Jackson’s attorney, Daniel Reback, said in a statement. “We are confident that the lawsuit will end with Mr. Jackson’s complete victory and vindication.”
Advertisement
Representatives for Hart did not respond to a request for comment.
End of carouselThe scandal dates back to 2017, when an anonymous person allegedly told Hart’s then-pregnant wife, Eniko Parrish, that they had a sex tape of Hart and model Montia Sabbag. Hart apologized over the matter in an Instagram video, saying he made a “bad error in judgment” and that he would “not allow a person to have a financial gain off of my mistakes.” An Instagram account then asked Hart for $5 million so that they wouldn’t release the sex tape, according to a report from Rolling Stone.
Sabbag denied playing a role in the extortion plot.
Jackson was arrested in 2018 over accusations of trying to extort Hart over the sex tape, according to the lawsuit. Hart said at the time he was “hurt” and “lost for words and simply in complete disbelief at the moment” over the arrest.
Advertisement
But the charges against Jackson were later dropped, according to the lawsuit, and Jackson has since denied the allegations.
Share this articleShareIn December 2019, Hart, under his company Hartbeat, released a Netflix docuseries that accused Jackson of extortion and involvement in the sex tape’s creation, the lawsuit says.
Nearly two years later in July 2021, Jackson and Hart agreed on a settlement that would require Hart to share a statement that exonerated Jackson and cleared his name, per the suit. Hart was meant to say “all charges against JT Jackson have been dropped and he is not guilty and had nothing to do with it” as a way to help revive Jackson’s career, according to the lawsuit.
However, the complaint says, Hart “willfully deviated” from the agreed-upon language. In his statement, shared on Instagram in October 2021, Hart said that charges against Jackson were dropped, but he did not use the previously agreed-upon wordage, the lawsuit says.
Advertisement
“I can say I’m happy that that chapter of my life is over,” Hart said in his apology at the time. “I’m happy that we were able to put a period on that sentence, and I’m excited to get back to life as we once knew it. I want to get back to life as I once knew it and put that behind me, and move on.”
The lawsuit says that Hart’s statement caused “significant harm and irreparable damage” to Jackson’s career “by framing the exoneration more as a conclusion to a chapter in Hart’s own life rather than a clear and unequivocal exoneration” of Jackson.
“Despite the eventual dismissal of these charges, the harm inflicted upon Plaintiff’s reputation and career was profound,” the lawsuit says. “The public dissemination of accusations, fueled by Hart and amplified by the media, along with a concerted smear campaign, cast a long shadow over Plaintiff’s professional standing and personal life.”
Advertisement
Jackson is seeking more than $12 million in damages for fraud and intentional emotional distress.
The fallout from the sex tape scandal was widespread and has continued to follow both Jackson and Hart, who has briefly alluded to the scandal since it happened. Sabbag, the model, filed a lawsuit in 2020 against Hart and Jackson, claiming they worked together to create and share the sex tape to promote Hart’s “Irresponsible Tour,” Rolling Stone reported. The case was later dismissed.
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7uK3SoaCnn6Sku7G70q1lnKedZLKvwMSrq5qhnqKyr8COa2drbF9lhHB9kGiinq6Zo3qprdGtZKytlZl6tLHXZquaqJVirrG7y6iesmc%3D